|
|
- Ilisu:
Austrian delegate of the Greens back from on site-inspection
-
-
- Sissy Danninger
-
-
- Fears for the environment
confirmed, massive concerns about human rights added
-
- Before
her departure she had already had severe concerns about environmental
damage and the imminent destruction of irretrievable cultural values as
a consequence of the construction of the Ilisu-dam. Now she returned
from her on site-inspection in the region of Hasankeyf (Kurdish: Eskif)
on the River Tigris with additional massive concerns about human rights
violations, which will be caused by the implementation of the project by
an Austrian-led consortium.
-
 |
- Eva
Glawischnig, deputy speaker of the oppositional Austrian Greens,
parliamentary delegate and third president of the national
assembly, visited the region with a small delegation from May 28th
to 31st. Although invited repeatedly no
representatives of the governing Socialists (SPÖ) and Christian
Democrats (ÖVP) had joined her. On Monday, June 4th,
2007 Glawischnig presented her experiences, impressions and
talks at a press conference.
-
-
- “Cynical”
depictions by export credit agencies
-
- She
called the depictions given in Europe by the export credit
agencies of Austria, Germany and Switzerland and the companies
involved in those three countries “cynical”. According to
those presentations 55.000 people would be affected by the
inundations, and no more than 15.000 among them would have to be
resettled. The majority would “just” lose their land and not
their houses.
|
-
-
- Contrary
to those figures a study by Middle East University in the Turkish
capital Ankara concludes that between 65.000 and 80.000 inhabitants will
have to leave the region because of the project, Glawischnig said.
Non-governmental organizations even expect up to 120.000 people to
become affected. Apart from their scanty stone houses many of them did
not own land at all or just less than five hectares, thus earning their
living as day labourers with the few great land owners (mostly living in
Ankara) for two to three Euros a day.
-
-
- “The poorest will hardly
be compensated”
-
- Those
people would receive but poor compensations for the destruction of their
tiny properties, if any at all, - by far not enough for them to find
secure new existences, Glawischnig thinks. As a consequence Osman
Baydemir, mayor of the provincial capital Diyarbekir, expects about
30.000 to 40.000 Ilisu-refugees for his town only.
-
- Following
resettlements because of the construction of other hydroelectric
power-stations as well as a result of the military conflicts between the
Turkish army and Kurdish rebels the number of inhabitants in Diyarbekir
has already risen from about 200.000 to more than a million during the
last ten years. 40 percent of them were living beneath the poverty level
in spite of (overstrained) social institutions - in circumstances
including everything from child labour to criminal offences. Similar
developments were menacing other towns like Mardin or Batman.
-
-
- Bad experiences with
Birecik-dam at the Euphrates
-
- Very
much like now with Ilisu information about the consequences for the
inhabitants was sparse in the course of the construction of Birecik-dam
at the Euphrates already, which - with Austrian economic involvement,
too - was finished in 2001, Glawischnig reported. Promises had been made
but were not kept in the end. Above all the flooding started six weeks
earlier than originally planned and caused people to flee head over
heels with no chance to save their poor possessions or their livestock.
Many of them were even poorer today than before the dam was built and
have never been compensated.
-
-
- Hasankeyf’s cultural
heritage “will not be saved”
-
- In
no way would it be possible to save the cultural heritage of more than
10.000 year old Hasankeyf with its more than 600 cave-homes in the rocks
and over 200 antique sites from submersion by the relocation of parts
onto an archaeological park yet to be built according to the
consortium’s plans, the delegate stressed. In fact the town fully
matches all necessary UNESCO-criteria for a world cultural heritage
site, she said. Yet, Hasankeyf was never formally nominated as such by
Turkey. But the country’s ratification of UNESCO’s convention for
the protection of the world’s cultural and natural heritage in 1983
already obliges Turkey to preserve such sites theoretically.
-
-
- Destruction of still sound
riverine environment of the Tigris
-
- Contrary
to the River Euphrates, which has already suffered severe damage by a
series of dams and reservoirs, the riverine environment of the Tigris
was still mostly sound, Glawischnig related. Flora and fauna were
largely unique and not yet explored or described completely. Scientists
in the area complained about being put under pressure by the Turkish
authorities in order to make them give up their work as the reservoir
would come inevitably.
-
-
- Repairing the grid and
sustainable tourism instead of the power-plant
-
- Repairs
of the desolate Turkish grid instead of the construction of the power
plant with its planned 1.200 MW would be an economic alternative with
truly positive effects for the region according to the Austrian
parliamentarian. Electricity losses amounted to 20 percent in Turkey -
compared to an average of 8 percent internationally - due to the bad
condition of power lines. In spite of its enormous dimensions Ilisu
would not be capable to supply more than 2 or 3 percent of the
country’s electricity-demand. Renewable energies would offer great
potential as well, which is not yet made use of. Estimates calculate up
to 50.000 MW for wind energy alone. Last, but not least, the region of
Hasankeyf and its inhabitants would get a real chance for sustainable
development and thousands of durable jobs by environmentally adapted
soft tourism.
-
- Presently
there is not a single hotel in Hasankeyf.
|
|
|